Skip to main content
Understanding the facets of any consumer or media journey can unleash a host of insights and ultimately lead to serious business opportunities. Such is the case for programmatic advertising, which has become one of the key areas of investment for advertisers.
As the programmatic landscape continues to evolve, ISBA has been working closely with our members and the industry to gain a clear picture of the journey involved, giving us a real insight into both the challenges and opportunities that programmatic presents, all of which were highlighted at our recent Roundtable event.
Featuring insights from our event partners and programmatic experts The Exchange Lab, plus Nationwide's Director of Digital Marketing and Social Media, Alex Bennett, the three hour event was packed with practical learnings for all stages of the programmatic journey.
Some of the key insights to come from the session are outlined below and can be used to help guide you on your journey to programmatic excellence:
For more information on how The Exchange Lab can assist you and help deliver your programmatic strategy, please visit their website.
If you have any concerns or questions at any stage, ISBA is happy to discuss the realities of programmatic advertising with you and the team, so do get in touch with me.
Although the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) continues to dominate most of the headlines, the impending EU regulation on ePrivacy (ePR) deserves just as much attention given the impact it will have on the industry.
1. EXPERTISE AND USER TESTING ARE NEEDED TO ENSURE THAT CONSENT ISN’T JUST A BOX-TICKING EXERCISES
Over the last five years ISBA has been working with the ICO and our members on events and guidance to ensure compliance with the GDPR, due to be implemented in May 2018. ISBA believes that user testing is required to define how, where and when consent should be gathered to give consumers transparency, choice and control over their personal data.
Acknowledging the need for the Regulation to develop principles on consent, the new laws need to incorporate new technology and be future-proofed to ensure that they are relevant in a few years’ time. The best methods to ask for consent will vary depending on the context – prescriptive regulation can’t allow for this. ePR is currently too prescriptive, as it mandates: • How consent should be gathered - via software settings
• When consent should be gathered - during installation
ISBA believes that advertisers are best placed to determine the most effective methods to gain consent from users, within the rules confirmed by GDPR. There are a number of ways to achieve this, including:
• Working with experts in user experience (UX), web design, e-commerce analysis and online behaviour
• Methods for gathering consent must be tested on users in real-life situations to avoid consent becoming a ‘tick-box’ exercise, with users having little or no understanding of what they are actually consenting to.
2.EXCEPTIONS FOR WEB AUDIENCE MEASURING SHOULDN’T BE LIMITED TO FIRST PARTIES
3. CONSISTENCY WITH GDPR IS CRUCIAL FOR LEGAL CERTAINTY
4. A TECH-NEUTRAL, RISK-BASED APPROACH IS NECESSARY TO AVOID UNINTENTIONAL RESTRICTIONS
5. USERS SHOULD BE EMPOWERED TO MAKE INFORMED CHOICES ABOUT HOW THEIR DATA IS USED
ISBA’s work in this area is being led by our Data Action Group. Our next meeting, taking place on 27 July will feature Catherine Armitage, Senior Manager, Public Affairs and Digital Governance Exchange at the WFA. Catherine leads their lobbying in Brussels and will provide an update for members on the latest developments and insights on the ePrivacy Regulation.
If you are interested in becoming a member of this group and contributing to our thinking in this important area, please contact me.
It is anticipated that the ePR might become law by 25 May 2018, when the GDPR will also become law. Find out more about the ePR here.
DPN LEGITIMATE INTERESTS GUIDANCE – GDPR
You may also be interested to know that guidance has been published on how and when marketers can engage with audiences using Legitimate Interest as a basis under the GDPR. The guidance has been produced by the Data Protection Network with the support of ISBA and our members and is available here.
Marketing Services Manager, ISBA
Recent studies have shown that young people are now spending more and more of their time online, rather than watching TV. While the desire for internet access has more than surpassed the need to look for the remote, the shift in platform preferences needed to be addressed from a regulatory point of view.
While existing BCAP codes governed how HFSS products were advertised on TV, they did not translate to the digital environment.
All that is to change however, as on 01 July, the CAP Code on advertising food and soft drinks to children will be brought into line with existing rules on TV advertising. This now means that ads that ‘directly or indirectly promote an HFSS product cannot appear in children’s media’, be it print, cinema, or digital – and that includes social media and advergames.
As on TV, advertisements for HFSS products can no longer appear on children's media and cannot rely on licensed characters or celebrities popular with children to promote them, regardless of the platform used.
While generally welcomed by the industry, the ‘tough’ new rules do present a challenge for advertisers and as the Code comes into effect, here are some useful tools to help ensure you comply:
As the advertisers’ representative on CAP, ISBA had significant input into the direction of the new rules, taking the concerns and needs of our members into account.
We fully support the new rules, designed as a means to protect children and ensure that 'advertising regulation plays its part in tackling the public health challenges related to poor childhood diet and responds effectively to fundamental changes in the way children consumer media.' We will continue to ensure the needs and concerns of our members are met in all future developments.
Key elements of the code for advertisers:
Have you ever wondered what keeps your marketing peers awake at night? How other organisations are approaching the marketing transformation that’s sweeping our industry? Or even how other CMOs are preparing for a future media ecosystem?
ISBA sits in a privileged position, in a constant dialogue with and surveying the behaviours of the biggest brands in the country, this gives us a unique perspective on what’s exciting and worrying our marketers and enables us to track key trends and activities.
This week we are thrilled to share some brand new insights from a tracking study, Media 2020 on which we partnered with MediaSense and IPSOS Connect. The study explores how ISBA members are organising themselves to meet the challenges of the rapidly evolving media ecosystem.
With over 260 senior marketers and media decision makers taking part, the report is one of the most comprehensive surveys on marketing change management to date and builds on trends we identified in a similar study in 2015.
The report indicates that ISBA members are a progressive bunch, leading the way in reconfiguring themselves into more data driven, customer centric businesses.
All interviewees agreed that organising resources around customers also means owning customer strategy and customer data. Over three quarters of respondents (78%) rate data analytics and data insights as a critical media capability (vs. 67% in 2015) and over half (54%) see data management as an in-house capability (up from 42% in 2015).
Marketers told us they felt empowered by data, that it enables them to be more accountable and drives more authority for marketing at board level. For all, insight from data, not the data itself, was absolutely crucial to driving growth of their organisation and controlling that customer data, allowing greater visibility of the customer journey, was critical.
In-sourcing data management activities, data modelling and data activation is increasingly common amongst brands as they build their confidence. This is having an interesting effect on agency relationships, with over half the respondents in the survey claiming they would seek strategic advice on data management not from their agency partners but from their own internal teams, or as one senior marketer put it:
“As a result of the new insight performance teams, we have taken back strategic control of our brands from agencies”
And this charge to in-house activities is being led by the c-suite, over two-thirds (68%) of directors agreed that marketers will do more in-house. Amongst more data- driven businesses there is an imperative to bring in new specialist talent with distinct skill sets, especially around data science.
Marketing is broadening its scope and taking control with the emergence of new super integrated marketing teams including data scientists, marketing scientists, analysts and engineers working seamlessly together to drive growth. Agile ways of working are breaking down organisational silos.
Agility of operating models is now a prerequisite, both internally and externally, in order to achieve this data driven, customer centric nirvana. Key requirements of new operating models highlighted were flexibility, adaptability, scalability and iterative thinking over rigid process.
Agency partners are now expected to present more flexible, varied and agile models, to experiment and change as their client needs evolve BUT many felt agency models were not evolving quickly enough and are hampered by legacy structures and processes. And in a watch out for the agency community, 62% of respondents said they will be using fewer agencies in the future.
In essence this study affirms that marketing will continue on its road to transformation, many are already on the data delivery superhighway, but many more are yet to progress. There is only one certainty in this current environment and that is that more change is to come, a fact echoed by the 80% of respondents who indicated that further organisational change is required if they are going to develop and deliver dynamic creative.
Get your copy of the full report
Media 2020 is rich in insight and I have only touched on a tiny part of what we discovered here, for further insights you can request a copy of the report from me.
Director of Consultancy & Best Practice, ISBA
Find out more about the AVMSD here.
With greater focus on extremist material, fake news and brand advertising appearing next to unsavoury content, brand safety has again been thrust fully into the limelight. The immediacy of social media makes it far easier for people to spot and share “campaigns that have gone wrong,” resulting in brand safety now being brought to the attention of the masses. What was once a problem discussed solely amongst the digital advertising industry, now has become national front-page news.
When people explain brand safety, they typically use an example of how things go wrong in a display campaign. One classic given example is that an ad for a family-focused brand appears on a website with adult content. Another commonly quoted example is that an ad for an airline runs beside a news article about a plane crash.
Careless insertion of an ad could start a public relations firestorm and ultimately damage a brand’s image and reputation. These examples are vivid and easy to understand, but they can make brand safety sound simpler than it is. First of all, a major brand safety misconception must be addressed by brands.
The top misconception around brand safety that we hear is that brand safety is just about setting up a list of blocked domains and this ensures your brand’s online safety.
This is one approach to enforcing brand safety - simply draw up a list of websites and mobile apps that you know will have content that your brand will deem inappropriate and then avoid buying impressions from any properties on that list. While this approach has some merit, it also has several serious drawbacks: Lack of precision: If you block an entire domain because some of its pages are unsavoury, you lose out on the scale you could achieve with other, high-quality pages in that same domain. Continual manual update: A blocked list has to be constantly expanded as new properties are being created every day. Domain spoofing: Bad actors know their website is on your list and will fraudulently sell it under a name you trust instead.
With fake news and extremist sites dominating the headlines, protecting your brand is more important than ever. Verification providers are able to help protect your campaigns from unsafe environments in the planning stage, as well as during the campaign.
Here are 5 tips to protect your brand online:
Brand safety isn’t a new problem, we have been building effective solutions since 2009, but new threats can appear unexpectedly. Now that the industry has refocused its gaze on brand safety, what’s next for this topic? Now that brands, agencies and the wider general public are aware of the extent of brand risk within our industry, hopefully the industry can come together to address the challenge and provide effective solutions.
Brands are coming under ever greater pressure to prove that their budgets are being spent efficiently and that their campaigns reach their target consumer.
Speaking at last month’s JICWEBS (Joint Industry Committee for Web Standards) Townhall event, Alex Tait, UK & Ireland Media Director at Unilever, said the industry needs a collective change in behaviours and mind-set. Accepting that trade bodies can’t solve problems such as viewability and ad fraud on their own, Tait also called for leadership from the whole industry – primarily advertisers, agencies and media owners.
Unilever, together with Shell, Santander, Nationwide and Google, have been working with their industry partners on the JICWEBS Cross-Industry Anti-Fraud Working Group to reduce the risk to exposure to Ad Fraud.
Tait feels that it’s becoming more difficult to get consensus as fragmentation generates more media players, claiming that it’s hard to drive change in an organisation, even harder in a whole ecosystem. He added that ‘burning platforms’ such as ad verification and ad blocking has made it even more important to restore trust and confidence in Digital.
The good news is that members of ISBA’s Digital Action Group identified Ad Viewability, Ad Fraud and Online Brand Safety as being the biggest priorities for digital this year – issues being tackled by JICWEBS. Tait, who used to chair the Group’s meetings, believes that ad verification will remain a priority for advertisers next year.
Tait also called for advertisers to deepen their engagement with publishers. Acknowledging that the JICWEBS standard on Viewability for display ads is a good starting point, he feels that advertisers need to implement change on Viewability themselves, setting the bar higher and establishing their own standards.
To conclude, Tait stressed that advertisers need to help fix the basics first, allowing Digital to trade on a like for like basis with other media.
Members can get involved by:
In the second of a two-part series ahead of the IPA's Effectiveness Week, ISBA's media and advertising manager eyes a world of cloud-based broadcasting.
In the first of a two-part series ahead of the IPA's Effectiveness Week, ISBA's media and advertising manager discusses the future of TV